<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gait analysis by satellite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themobilecity.nl/2008/09/13/gait-analysis-by-satellite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themobilecity.nl/2008/09/13/gait-analysis-by-satellite/</link>
	<description>Mobile Media and Urban Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Watching Them, Watching Us</title>
		<link>http://www.themobilecity.nl/2008/09/13/gait-analysis-by-satellite/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Watching Them, Watching Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themobilecity.nl/2008/09/13/gait-analysis-by-satellite/#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>Plenty of people already avoid  spy satellite surveillance e.g. military forces, smugglers, terrorists etc. - the low earth orbits are entirely predictable, simply a matter of physics and observation. All the relevant information is available on the internet compiled by amateur astronomers. e.g. http://www.satobs.org/

Attempting to  take detailed photos, let alone perform &quot;gait analysis&quot;   from geostationary satellites i.e. from a distance of about 37,000 kilometres, is  never going to happen.

Changing your gait enough to confuse these algorithms, can be as simple as changing your shoes.

Gait analysis is first being tried out on urban CCTV cameras networks, rather than via satellites, and, like other biometric technologies, it is hugely inaccurate and prone to false positives and false negatives.

There have been research projects for real time video  &quot;suspicious behavior&quot; analysis (e.g. dwell time or loitering near parked cars), and attempts at detecting &quot;stabbing&quot; or &quot;kicking&quot; motions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of people already avoid  spy satellite surveillance e.g. military forces, smugglers, terrorists etc. &#8211; the low earth orbits are entirely predictable, simply a matter of physics and observation. All the relevant information is available on the internet compiled by amateur astronomers. e.g. <a href="http://www.satobs.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.satobs.org/</a></p>
<p>Attempting to  take detailed photos, let alone perform &#8220;gait analysis&#8221;   from geostationary satellites i.e. from a distance of about 37,000 kilometres, is  never going to happen.</p>
<p>Changing your gait enough to confuse these algorithms, can be as simple as changing your shoes.</p>
<p>Gait analysis is first being tried out on urban CCTV cameras networks, rather than via satellites, and, like other biometric technologies, it is hugely inaccurate and prone to false positives and false negatives.</p>
<p>There have been research projects for real time video  &#8220;suspicious behavior&#8221; analysis (e.g. dwell time or loitering near parked cars), and attempts at detecting &#8220;stabbing&#8221; or &#8220;kicking&#8221; motions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

