Written by Michiel de Lange.
Posted on March 29, 2008.
Tagged mobile_devices, mobility, representation. Bookmark the Permalink.
↑ Newer post: KPN & Hyves cooperate: proximity-based social networking
↓ Older post: Hackers attack epileptics forum: crossing digital borders
↑ Newer post: KPN & Hyves cooperate: proximity-based social networking
↓ Older post: Hackers attack epileptics forum: crossing digital borders
 
Michiel de Lange (1976) is a part-time Lecturer in New Media Studies at Utrecht University, and a researcher and adviser of new media and urbanism. He is trained as a cultural anthropologist, and holds a PhD in philosophy (2010) with a dissertation about mobile media technologies and urban identities. He collaborated in a locative media art & science project (www.nomadicmilk.net). He worked for Knowledgeland, a Dutch think-tank that aims to strengthen the knowledge-based society. He also worked for Cybersoek, a computer neighborhood center in Amsterdam. He is advisor e-culture at Mediafonds. Michiel is on Twitter and LinkedIn.
Mobile phone access for Cubans: the ‘mobile’ as rhetorical force
Another interesting item:
The BBC reports that Cubans get access to mobile phones, as Raul Castro lifts the ban on possessing them:
This reminds me of Tim Cresswell’s keynote speech in which he showed how the term ‘mobility’ is always infused with meanings and values. In this case it seems the mobile phone becomes a symbol for reform, social change, modernity, political opening and transparency. I really feel his point about the value-laden aspects of ‘mobility’ (and consequently also ‘mobile technologies’) is extremely important for all working in the field of mobile technologies. The apprehension Tim voiced in workshop 2 towards the term “mobility paradigm” perhaps also stems from the realization that a paradigm – with enough people ‘in’ it – inevitably means basic concepts (like ‘mobile’) are accepted as validation and legitimization in themselves for working on them. And yes, we too realize that “The Mobile City” has exactly this rhetorical power: a whole new view on, and approach to the city, paradoxically both inevitable as a future image and simply here & now as an empirical fact.